mankybansal(over 1 year ago)

This is awesome! The state when you `undo` and then add any amount makes the `redo` confusing. I would expect the redo to be disabled because I wouldn't want to perform the action that was `undone` after I add an amount. For example, I would expect this: 0 (R: disable, U: disable) +100 (R: disable, U: -100) Undo (R: +100, U: disable) +10 (R: disable, U: -10) Rather than: 0 (R: disable, U: disable) +100 (R: disable, U: -100) Undo (R: +100, U: disable) +10 (R: +100, U: -10)